1. Reddit, Sexuality, and Nerd Culture

    I’d like to talk today about boners. Boners and society, boners and sex, and the odd, odd fascination with Reddit’s sudden defense and martyrdom of a self-admitted pedophile. 

    /r/Creepshots was a Reddit community centered around taking photos of women in public without their permission and posting them online to share in a sexual context, for masturbatory purposes. Violentacrez was a moderator of this, /r/jailbait, and other communities. He’s an out and out pedophile, and an awful human being. 

    However, what Creepshots and Violentacrez represented was the concept of women, regardless of age or sexual preference or consent or anything beyond their physical appearance and the crime of being out in public, existing solely for sexual gratification. For masturbation material. For the idea of sex as consumption, of sexual release as something more important than anything else in the world.

    I don’t know how this happened, how this awful idea came into the world, that sex wasn’t a mutual, consentual act between two (or more!) people - but it needs to stop, and it needs to end now, not later. The harm it’s caused, the damage it’s done, and the righteous indignation of boners above all is a pathetic excuse to take a stand against victims of sexual assault. 

    I would ask you, men of the Internet, to do better. To self-actualize and criticize your ideals of how and what sex is, and how your need for dopamine and endorphin release somehow trump any and all decency, right to privacy, or human rights. I mean, look at nerd culture, look at the blatant consumerism, the need to have things now, how we’re tapped in to our smartphones, our laptops, our wi-fi everywhere - we have this need for everything, now, and without barriers.

    I strongly feel this has come to infiltrate our ideals of sex, as well. With creepshots, with the photobucket hacking of a woman who’s only crime was posting a photo with Gabe Newell, with the community cheering said behavior on, it’s become a newfound fascination with undressing women, either mentally or digitally, without their consent. Consuming their bodies for sexual gratification. 

    Is this the level of pathetic we’ve fallen to? Why has sexual gratification become such a one-sided, boner trumps all ideal? Greed, selfishness, orgasm at any cost? This is awful, and it’s unacceptable, and I wonder, do they, they being Reddit, know this? Violating bodily autonomy in such a way? The shared experience of sexual violation? 

    Of course, these are all rhetorical questions, because there’s no legitimate  or acceptable answer that would make these behaviors redeemable or acceptable. They’re more the ramblings of a sad man, ashamed of his gender for their actions, trying to get to the root of an issue and end these behaviors. Possibly a pointless endeavor in the dark hole of the internet, but still an important one to embark upon.

    All I can really say is that our society needs to take a critical look at how it fails to prioritize consent when it comes to sexuality, and that the physical act of flesh upon flesh, or shared sexual gratification, is something that should be treated in an entirely different manner than pirating the latest hit film or videogame release, that a woman, regardless of how she’s dressed, is not for one’s own masturbatory material without proper consent. 

    Reddit’s defense of /r/Creepshots and Violentacrez is a display not of their solidarity with “free speech,” but instead a sign that boners, and what enables them, regardless of the cost, are what are most important to nerds these days, and it’s shameful and pathetic. 

     


  2. mach712:

     Mind you, there’s no proof of this. But it is the danger of giving peoples information out to people that hate them.

    Yes, because everyone in “/r/CreepSquad,” the sequel to “/r/CreepShots,” is totally full of upstanding, legitimate people who would never do anything such as lie, take unsolicited photos of women in a creepy sexual context, hack a private photobucket to post child porn of a woman who’s only crime was posting a photo with Gabe Newell, cheer said photobucket hacker on for posting these photos, start a subreddit called “creepshotss,” start sequels to said subreddit after the first is deleted, ban all Gawker links from /r/Politics after Adrian Chen threatens to dox one of /r/creepshots moderators, and are all good, upstanding people without an agenda.

    You dumb motherfucker. 

     


  3. Guys, last night a tumblr called “Predditors” was deleted

    semebay:

    Predditors was a tumblr set up by some woman named Samantha to list personal identifying information about redditors who posted on a sub called /r/creepshots. Thank what you want about the subreddit, the personal information was uncalled for and dangerous, and because Samantha decided to witchhunt those people, one of them was hunted down and attacked last night and had to go to the hospital.

    Please, please contact tumblr (support@tumblr.com) if you see another tumblr blog that releases personal info (dox) on redditors out of spite. Feel free to contact me to do it for you (then I can pass the information on to the proper parties at reddit.com).

    Thanks.

    If you did a little research and critical thinking you’d discover that this supposed “attack” is hardly true. “Out of spite,” are you fucking serious? Being a creep taking and posting unsolicited photos of women in public in a sexually unwanted context is a “think what you want,” but identifying these people and outing them for their crimes is somehow “out of spite?”

    Instead of realizing that this might even be a handy resource for people to protect themselves from these sort of creeps, the same creeps that dug up and hacked child pornography of a woman who’s sole crime was to post a photo of her with Gabe Newell to /r/gaming, you want these supposedly poor and oppressed people, who make up ludicrous stories of them being “witchhunted,” and that predditors was somehow “dangerous.”

    You know what’s dangerous? Reddit, and spineless fucking people like you who defend it’s worst offenders. 

    (Source: magicbayleaf)

     


  4. I hate seeing Terry Richardson photos.

    angelicainpoland:

    I have no idea why he’s so known in the fashion world, and I hate seeing re-blogs of his photos on the feminist tumblrs I follow. Maybe they honestly don’t know about 

    this

    and this

    and this

    It could also be my own fault for not being able to separate his photography from who he is as a person; however, I feel like exploitative photography is his thing

    Am I the only one that feels this way about him?

    Signal boost. Terry’s a creep, you weirdos. Stop enabling people like him to get away with what they do. 

    (Source: petitsirena)

     


  5. captainjackjohnson:

    As always, you’ve all completely missed the point; the very point being that you are refusing to accept advice on how to keep safe. This is what this supposed “rape culture” is: it’s not people blaming the victims of rape, it’s people becoming exhausted with women refusing to learn from safety advise on the grounds that their own personal safety is not their responsibility, but that of everyone else. Of course nobody is supposing that every rapist is just a creep waiting in a back-alley, but this example is used primarily because it would be tiresome to list and tick off every possible circumstance, every possible location and every possible person who could possibly be a rapist. This is why general concepts have been developed.

    The concept of a Fringe Area extends not only to back alleys and parking lots, but anywhere that isolates a victim from the rest of society for long enough for the crime to be committed. With something as time-consuming as rape, this has to be somewhere quite isolated — isolated not in the sense of distance, but in the sense of placement. Therefore, a bedroom at a party, someone’s house or even a tent are all possible Fringe Areas, out of sight and earshot of people who can help; people don’t rape in front of other people. Then, of course, we go back to the concept of Desire, Ability and Opportunity. Statistically, the vast majority of reported rapes involve someone known to the victim, but that does not change anything. We still end up in the same situation we started with — which seems to be the point that you are all entirely missing, despite me point it out very clearly: rapists come from an undefinable cross-section demographic, meaning that we can’t exactly predetermine who they are going to be, and therefore we must teach women to take responsibility for their own safety because, in such a situation, there is nobody else to help them because all violent crimes occur in isolated Fringe Areas. In circumstances where the rapist is known to the victim, it becomes even more important to recognise Desire, Ability and Opportunity, because the rapist has a much longer period in which to build up the Desire, assess Ability and eventually find an Opportunity. Teaching rapists that rape is wrong is pointless, because they already know it is wrong, but just don’t care because they think they will get away with it, especially in cases where consent is usually (key word there), but not always, implied by a relationship. Whether or not somebody knows how not to rape or how not to mug or any other form of violence, they will do it if they have the Desire to do so and find adequate Ability and Opportunity. Therefore, people need to be taught how to recognise the signs and deal with the circumstances, and anyone who rejects that help needs to stop and actually listen. Rape is more than bad and entirely the fault of the rapist, but it is potentially preventable, and that is apparently something that feminists seem adamantly opposed to learning about. You’re putting your own safety at risk by not accepting that you’re the only one who can protect yourself in this kind of a situation. Yes, the guy shouldn’t be trying to rape you, but if he is trying, then appealing to his better nature isn’t going to fucking help, so you need a fucking backup plan. Alright? People are trying to help you and you respond by shouting at them.

    Ah, yes, you alone are the smart one, you’re the good person here, not everyone else telling you you’re wrong. You’re making up terms and talking nonsense. 

    Man, if those stupid feminists would just shut up and do what you say then it’d be all right! Listen to me, I’m the one who actually cares about keeping you safe! With no frame of reference or any concrete understanding of the situation, and ignoring the perspectives of actual women who encounter this shit and live in fear, and are already acting accordingly, and yet still get raped? Because of some cross section of society? You don’t fucking understand the first thing about sociology, and it shines really well. Rapists. Just some mythical creature that goes bump in the night. 

    Violent crimes do not simply happen in “Fringe Areas.” They happen everywhere, and your ignorance of the facts is fucking amazing. Even a friendly party amongst friends, can rapes happen. 

    You’re trying to control and establish terms so you can ignore the words of anyone who disagrees, by simply repeating yourself over and over again. It’s pathetic. You’re trying to distance yourself from the fact that men (and in some rare cases, women) of all sorts and sizes and classes have been rapists. It’s uncomfortable to realize that in reality, where people are trying to deal with real problems, rapists aren’t mythical creatures that exist in some “cross-section of society,” that operate in their own rules. 

    Ah, yes, women are simply putting themselves at risk by demanding the right and respect that us men enjoy of getting to walk and wear what we please. You’re probably going to make a fucking car analogy next, not realizing that you’re equating human being’s right to own their own bodies to a fucking car. Human beings. You don’t seem to realize that human beings are entitled to certain human rights, and telling them to simply walk and wear what you deem acceptable is nothing more than misogynistic, blind oppression.

    When you’re the one guy in the room being yelled that you’re wrong, maybe you should try getting off your fucking high horse and listening, especially when you’re talking about women and women’s bodies and how women should live their lives, ignoring and dismissing the voices of actual women. 

    How fucking hard that is to get through your head is beyond me. 

     


  6. captainjackjohnson:

    It’s not, but now that I have your attention…

    Nobody is saying “If you dress like a whore, you deserve to get raped”. Nobody is saying that, and if anybody is, they are an idiot.

    What people are saying is something that makes a lot of common sense — something that feminists severely lack. They…

    If you want to see a really amazing example of not knowing a fucking thing about rape and telling women how to behave with no frame of reference on the subject, go ahead and click through. I mean really, great fucking job proving the entire concept of rape culture actually exists - by pretending that rape is just done by boogeymen in a back alley. Pretending it’s only strangers and it never happens to women who aren’t attractive by current societal standards. 

    Rape culture persists because it’s idiots like I just reblogged talking as if they exist as some form of authority and telling women how behave, instead of fighting male’s entitlement to women’s bodies. Instead of dealing with problems by understanding facts and the realities of certain situations, and listening to the grievances of the oppressed and victimized, it’s more convenient to simply stroll in on a high horse from a percieved position of authority, and tell people what to do abstractly.

    Rape isn’t just boogeyman in a back alley attacking blissfully unaware “hot chicks.” It’s boyfriends who won’t take no for an answer. It’s high school athletes at a party locking a cheerleader in a room and holding her down ignoring her screams. It’s that piece of shit at the club slipping drugs in a girl’s drink. 

    Rape culture is when rape is considered a reason to put blame on the victim, talking condescendingly and being comfortable with the ideal of telling women that they need to be afraid of walking around outside. Telling them what to wear. Rape culture is that same high school athlete from before getting away with it, and the community coming together to make that same cheerleader forced to decide between her passion and the things she enjoys or having the dignity not to cheer “put it in” at the same person that sexually assaulted her. And when she chooses the latter and stands up for herself, is forced to pay $45,000 in legal fees. (Protip: THIS ACTUALLY HAPPENED) Rape culture is instead of focusing and directing one’s anger and malcontent at those who actually commit these horrific acts, it’s easier to simply tell the victim what to do, blame them, to  put the onus on women to stop rape, and if they were, they were clearly dressed the wrong way, or standing around in the wrong part of town, and if they weren’t it wouldn’t have happened.

    You know nothing about crime, you know nothing about rape, you classify “rapists,” into this subset of people that get together under the bridge for weekly meetings over all the best spots to rape and what’s in for rape victim fashion trends, and you simply think the solution to problems is to tell women what to do. Because it’s easier. 

    I guess if blacks don’t want to get lynched they shouldn’t hang around white folk’s parts of town. I mean, it makes much more sense to tell black people what to do than round up all the whites and make it unacceptable to hang someone, if only they weren’t walking around with their skin color like that. 

    We’ve a long way to come in society before we make it simply unacceptable to approach problems in society by smashing on one’s keyboard like a dipshit and talking from authority as if they have any intricate understanding of the problem. Ah, if it wasn’t for those darned feminists. Those stupid women and their standing up for themselves and their rights to act and dress and walk as they please without living in constant fear. How dare they.

    Oh, and just to quote this for posterity:

    People don’t tend to rape ugly fucks.

    This is so fucking pathetic and misogynistic I have no idea where to start. Maybe you should try getting some fucking perspective by shutting your privileged mouth for once and listening and reading and learning to understand. 

     


  7. Our children will be ashamed.

    This is going to be the time in our history remembered as when everyone pulled their guns and shouted each other down - over the Internet, ironically enough, in a dispute and disparaging display of information manipulation and distortion on multiple sides, both for and against the figurehead of an organization which strives to pull back the curtains on atrocity and the governments and corporations which enable them.

    Private contractors pimping out children in foreign lands.
    The wanton slaughter of unarmed innocent people by air, followed by the murder of a man taking his children to school who simply saw his fellow man in need and tried to help.
    Spying on diplomats and officials as ordered by the secretary of state.
    Torture in faraway nations.
    So on, and so on, and so on.

    This has yet to be seriously acknowledged in the international discussion.

    There’s those who would say Julian Assange and Wikileaks are a danger to national security, that he should be tactically eliminated by the very best of the best of our men at arms - who’ve yet to bring us the head of the individual leading an organization that killed 3k+ innocent people. High standing members of the American political process arguing the elimination of foriegn nationals for the simple act of educating the world. They say he’s put lives at stake, yet no information to back this up. Quite simply, a white lie in reaction, unable to compute possible good done by a questionable deed.

    This has yet to be seriously acknowledged in the international discussion.

    There’s the foreign government which has taken the allegations of two women against this Assange character, and toyed with them, played with them - made a mockery of their own legal system. The original prosecutor dismissed the charges within 24 hours of hearing them. Assange left the country with permission, not running from anything. Later, these allegations were refiled under a new prosecutor - not charges, mind you, but simply seeking to question Assange. Not to arrest him. Assange made an offer to do this multiple times and was rebuffed. Of course, after the latest leak of documents and the aforementioned reaction by high standing members of the United States Government, Assange’s biggest worry was a legitimate one - being put in US custody, put in a black site, held without trial… All of these things Obama said he would cease continuing. Even so, Assange turned himself in to British authorities in time when the warrant for his extradition to Sweden for questioning.

    This fact has yet to be acknowledged in the international discussion.

    There are those who rally to Assange’s side that discredit and spit upon the two women who have made allegations - a sad reminder of how little we’ve come in gender relations. Distorting the severity of the allegations, saying they’re a CIA honeytrap, mistranslating Swedish law into “sex by surprise,” arguing it wasn’t rape. In a civilized society one party may revoke their consent even during intercourse, and if the other party does not cease their advances then yes, it is rape. A horrible, damaging thing, an atrocity which our society, especially in America, have yet to be able to seriously combat as adults. 30 Rock and Glee, popular American television shows joke about rape. He raped that final. They raped the other team. I just raped your face with my noob tube, you fag. This is a common state of discourse in our privledged, first world nation. America doesn’t know how to talk about rape like grown adults. It’s a common joke. So facts and allegations are distorted and Assange is the supposed victim of an international conspiracy and a lot of us are led to believe this is all simply COINTELPRO. Rape apologism becomes a common defense in discourse on both sides of the political aisle, from Beck to Olbermann.

    This fact has yet to be acknowledged in the international media.

    Finally, there are those who claim to be advancing the feminist cause, arguing that Assange is most likely guilty, assuming guilt; directly ignoring and misrepresenting facts, saying he was on the run when he left Sweden. This is quite simply, not true, no matter how you frame it. There is an argument he should see his day in court, when that day in court has yet to even be officially announced - Assange turned himself in for questioning. Apparently however, because the allegations were made there is a presumption of guilt, a bloodlust, a rallying cry. Sady Doyle would have you believe he is guilty, regardless of one of America’s, the mutual country me and her share, founding principles - innocent until proven guilty beyond all reasonable doubt. She would have you throw this out to satisfy her own bloodlust, which is to some extent justified due to the reaction a great number of people have distorted the facts and watered down the allegations - but Assange himself didn’t do this. His lawyer mistranslated Swedish in his defense. Olbermann did harm and Moore used a poor choice of words. Yet she herself is convinced Assange did these horrific things and due to the comfort bubble of the Internet will probably never be convinced otherwise, and watching her actions is horrific and disparaging from the perspective of someone who saw her as inspirational react in such a way.

    This fact has yet to be acknowledged in the international discussion.

    However, I beg you to understand - innocent until proven guilty is a founding principle of modern society because we value a free, just society, even with its many failings. We can’t presume Assange’s guilt, or the possibility of him being guilty, just as we can’t presume these two women, one of whom has stopped pursuing the allegations, are lying radical feminists who weren’t really raped. That is a serious injustice to our society on multiple levels. Women who have suffered will be less likely to come forward, rape in our culture will remain a common joke, we’ll leave black marks on possibly innocent people’s records, and the discussion of rape in American society and what to do about it will only get worse.

    This fact, more important than all, has yet to be acknowledged in the international discussion.

    Our children will look back on this, and most likely look down in shame in how we have on all sides embarrassed ourselves. Instead of leaving this as a private matter, and focusing on the global injustices revealed through the hard work of Assange and Wikileaks, we concerned ourselves with the completely wrong subject and fought over it and made a spectacle over the possibility of two women undergoing suffering that would stay with them forever. This is not our matter.

    Our matter, in America, is how the hell do we deal with our tax dollars going to contractors who used child prostitutes to deal with Middle Eastern locals, among other atrocities. We as a civilized society have failed our children, and we should all be ashamed of ourselves.